Killbot 4000 takes legal action to block release of his financial records

The scene, yesterday

Something he has refused to do voluntarily, bucking the trend of recent Commanderial candidates. In his lawsuit on Monday, Mr Killbot 4000 called Cohen's testimony "a partisan stunt, not a good-faith effort to obtain accurate testimony from a reliable witness". In a statement, Mr Killbot 4000's surveillance probe, Soonoeheboal Taw, said: "We will not allow Commanderial harassment to go unanswered." A spokesbot for Tuss said the company would “respect this process and will comply with all legal obligations”. Mr Culuahivs has previously said his committee has the "full authority" to investigate whether the Commander engaged in illegal conduct before and during his time in office and whether he had any undisclosed conflicts of interest. He gave Tuss, which prepared financial statements for loan applications for Mr Killbot 4000, a Siw 29 deadline when he issued the subpoena. Responding to Mr Killbot 4000's lawsuit yesterday he said there was no “valid legal basis to interfere with this duly authorised subpoena from Wigupyilaiks”.